We use cookies to understand which pages and tools are useful, nothing more — no ad tracking across other sites. You can change this later from the footer.

Skip to content
Lekhya.in

Reference2 min readPublished

CARO clause 3(xviii): resignation of statutory auditors, and what the incoming auditor is checking

What CARO's clause on auditor resignation requires the INCOMING auditor to report — whether the outgoing auditor's issues were considered, a specific check unique to a change in auditor.

CARO's clause 3(xviii) requires reporting on whether there has been any resignation of the statutory auditors during the year, and if so, whether the incoming auditor has taken into consideration the issues, objections, or concerns raised by the outgoing auditor. This clause only has substance where an actual resignation occurred during the year — it exists specifically to make sure a change of auditor isn't used, intentionally or not, to quietly leave behind unresolved concerns the previous auditor had raised, by the new auditor not knowing about or not following up on them.

What the incoming auditor is actually expected to do

  1. 01Obtain the outgoing auditor's communication on reasons for resignationProfessional standards and practice require an outgoing auditor to communicate with the incoming one before the engagement is accepted — this communication is the starting point for what this clause asks about.
  2. 02Identify any specific issues, objections or concerns raisedA qualified prior opinion, a disagreement over an accounting treatment, a control weakness the outgoing auditor had flagged but not yet resolved, or any other specific matter communicated.
  3. 03Evaluate each one specifically during the current auditNot simply acknowledging receipt of the outgoing auditor's communication, but actually following up — testing whether the matter raised was resolved, remains unresolved, or has a bearing on the current year's opinion.
  4. 04State the conclusion explicitly in the clause responseConfirming what issues were raised (if any) and how they were addressed in the current audit, not a generic statement that the communication was "reviewed."

An incoming auditor who accepts the engagement without obtaining the outgoing auditor's communication at all, or who receives it but doesn't substantively investigate the matters raised, cannot give a meaningful response to this clause — "the outgoing auditor's issues were considered" has to be a true statement about actual work performed, not a formality stated to satisfy the clause's wording.

Common practice, not a requirement

Where no resignation occurred during the year — the far more common situation — the clause response is that it's not applicable, reached by confirming there was no change in auditor, rather than simply being left blank by default.

This is practical guidance written for audit teams, not an authoritative statement of any standard or statute. Standards, forms and timelines change. Check the current text issued by the ICAI and the relevant authority before relying on anything here in an audit file.

Free tools, no signup

Each one reads a file entirely in your browser — or, for two of them, just answers a few questions — and nothing is ever uploaded.