Ind AS 104 largely permits an insurer to continue existing accounting policies for insurance contracts, but it imposes one mandatory minimum test at every reporting date: a liability adequacy test, under which current estimates of all contractual cash flows (including claims handling costs and embedded options) are compared against the carrying amount of the insurance liability less related deferred acquisition costs and intangibles — and if the carrying amount is found inadequate, the entire deficiency is recognised in profit or loss immediately, with no smoothing permitted.
Audit procedures on the liability adequacy test
- 01Confirm the test used current estimates, not the original pricing assumptionsThe test has to use best-estimate assumptions as at the current reporting date — mortality, morbidity, lapse, expense and discount rate — not the assumptions priced into the product when it was originally sold.
- 02Independently evaluate the actuary as a management expertAssess the actuary's competence, objectivity and the reasonableness of the methodology, and obtain the underlying cash flow projections rather than accepting only the summary certificate.
- 03Test the policy data supplied to the actuarial modelReconcile the in-force policy count, sum assured and premium data used in the model to the policy administration system as at the valuation date.
- 04Check the deficiency, where one exists, was taken fully to profit or lossNo deferral or amortisation of a liability adequacy shortfall is permitted — confirm it hit the P&L in full in the period identified.
Regulatory requirement
Ind AS 104 does not permit catastrophe or equalisation provisions for possible future claims under contracts that do not exist at the reporting date — a liability can only be recognised for present obligations arising from contracts already in force.
This is practical guidance written for audit teams, not an authoritative statement of any standard or statute. Standards, forms and timelines change. Check the current text issued by the ICAI and the relevant authority before relying on anything here in an audit file.
Related resources
- Audit workflow & automationSA 540: auditing accounting estimates, where judgment replaces a verifiable numberAn estimate can't be vouched to a source document the way an invoice can. SA 540 is about what replaces vouching when there's no single right answer to check against.
- Audit documentationInd AS 37: provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets — the three-way splitThree categories, three completely different treatments — recognise it, disclose it, or say nothing. Getting the category wrong is the whole misstatement.
- Revenue, receivables & cut-offInd AS 109: financial instruments and the expected credit loss modelThe old model waited for a loss to be incurred before providing for it. ECL is built the opposite way — provide for the loss you expect, before it happens.
- Technology, data & AI in auditSA 520: analytical procedures, and why an unexplained fluctuation isn't a conclusionAn analytical procedure is only as good as the expectation it's measured against. Set the expectation after seeing the result, and the procedure proves nothing.
Free tools, no signup
Each one reads a file entirely in your browser — or, for two of them, just answers a few questions — and nothing is ever uploaded.
- Purchase register checkDuplicate payments, round-sum amounts, weekend-dated invoices, incomplete records.
- GSTR-2B reconcilerMatches your purchase register against GSTR-2B — missing invoices either side, amount mismatches.
- Bank reconciliation checkerMatches your cash book against a bank statement — what's outstanding on each side.
- Fixed asset register checkDuplicate asset codes, missing location or useful life, negative net book value.
- Payroll red-flag scannerBank accounts shared across employees, and records missing an ID, PAN or salary.
- CARO applicability checkerAnswer a few questions about the company and see which CARO 2020 clauses likely apply.
- MSME payment delay checkerMSME-flagged invoices paid — or still unpaid — beyond the 45-day Section 22 limit.
- Related-party transaction screenerTransactions above a threshold you set with no approval reference, grouped by counterparty.
- Depreciation useful life checkerCompares a useful life in use against the Schedule II, Part C indicative figure.
- Materiality calculatorOverall and performance materiality against PBT, revenue, assets or equity, with reasoning shown.
- Sample size calculatorStatistical sample size for a test of controls or a substantive test of detail.