We use cookies to understand which pages and tools are useful, nothing more — no ad tracking across other sites. You can change this later from the footer.

Skip to content
Lekhya.in

Guide2 min readPublished

Auditing Ind AS 104 — testing the liability adequacy assessment

What to audit under Ind AS 104 for entities holding insurance contract liabilities: the liability adequacy test an auditor must independently assess, and where actuarial reliance needs to be supplemented with direct evidence.

Ind AS 104 largely permits an insurer to continue existing accounting policies for insurance contracts, but it imposes one mandatory minimum test at every reporting date: a liability adequacy test, under which current estimates of all contractual cash flows (including claims handling costs and embedded options) are compared against the carrying amount of the insurance liability less related deferred acquisition costs and intangibles — and if the carrying amount is found inadequate, the entire deficiency is recognised in profit or loss immediately, with no smoothing permitted.

Audit procedures on the liability adequacy test

  1. 01Confirm the test used current estimates, not the original pricing assumptionsThe test has to use best-estimate assumptions as at the current reporting date — mortality, morbidity, lapse, expense and discount rate — not the assumptions priced into the product when it was originally sold.
  2. 02Independently evaluate the actuary as a management expertAssess the actuary's competence, objectivity and the reasonableness of the methodology, and obtain the underlying cash flow projections rather than accepting only the summary certificate.
  3. 03Test the policy data supplied to the actuarial modelReconcile the in-force policy count, sum assured and premium data used in the model to the policy administration system as at the valuation date.
  4. 04Check the deficiency, where one exists, was taken fully to profit or lossNo deferral or amortisation of a liability adequacy shortfall is permitted — confirm it hit the P&L in full in the period identified.

Regulatory requirement

Ind AS 104 does not permit catastrophe or equalisation provisions for possible future claims under contracts that do not exist at the reporting date — a liability can only be recognised for present obligations arising from contracts already in force.

This is practical guidance written for audit teams, not an authoritative statement of any standard or statute. Standards, forms and timelines change. Check the current text issued by the ICAI and the relevant authority before relying on anything here in an audit file.

Free tools, no signup

Each one reads a file entirely in your browser — or, for two of them, just answers a few questions — and nothing is ever uploaded.