Ind AS 36 requires an asset to be tested for impairment whenever an indicator exists, by comparing its carrying amount to its recoverable amount — the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use — and the audit work has to start with whether management correctly identified the cash-generating unit (CGU), because an asset is rarely tested on its own: it is tested as part of the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates independent cash inflows, and getting that grouping wrong changes the answer before a single discount rate is even examined.
Sequence to follow in the audit
- 01Test for impairment indicators firstExternal indicators (market value decline, adverse changes in the economic or regulatory environment, rising interest rates) and internal indicators (physical damage, restructuring, worse-than-budgeted performance) should be evaluated even at entities where management asserts no impairment is needed — a CGU with recurring operating losses is the most common missed trigger.
- 02Challenge the CGU identificationConfirm the CGU is the smallest group generating independent cash inflows largely independent of other assets — not an artificially broadened unit chosen because a larger pool of cash flows makes the impairment disappear.
- 03Assess whether fair value less costs of disposal or value in use was used, and whyWhere value in use is used, this is inherently the more judgemental route and typically where audit effort should concentrate.
- 04Recompute the value-in-use model independently on a sample of key inputsCash flow projections should be based on the most recent board-approved budgets (typically capped at five years without specific justification for longer), with a terminal growth rate that does not exceed the long-term average growth rate for the products, industries or country of operation, discounted at a pre-tax rate reflecting current market assessments of the time value of money and asset-specific risks.
- 05Trace the discount rate build-upA WACC-derived discount rate should be recomputed from observable inputs (risk-free rate, equity risk premium, beta, cost of debt), not accepted as a number carried forward from the prior year's valuation.
A value-in-use model that just happens to produce a recoverable amount a few percentage points above carrying value, on cash flow projections that have missed budget in each of the prior years without explanation, is a sensitivity-analysis red flag — stress-test the discount rate and terminal growth assumptions before accepting the headroom.
Goodwill — the one asset tested every year regardless of indicators
Goodwill allocated to a CGU is tested for impairment annually irrespective of whether any indicator exists, and the allocation of goodwill to CGUs at acquisition, and any reallocation on a subsequent restructuring, needs its own audit trail back to the purchase price allocation.
This is practical guidance written for audit teams, not an authoritative statement of any standard or statute. Standards, forms and timelines change. Check the current text issued by the ICAI and the relevant authority before relying on anything here in an audit file.
Related resources
- Fixed assets & capexImpairment testing for fixed assets: a practical approachThe impairment indicators that actually matter for a mid-market client, when a formal test is genuinely warranted, and how to test management's recoverable amount workings.
- Fixed assets & capexFixed asset register audit: completeness and accuracy checksWhat a fixed asset register must contain, how to tie it to the general ledger, and the gaps that quietly survive year after year if nobody checks for them.
- Fixed assets & capexPhysical verification of fixed assets: how to plan itA rotational verification policy, reconciling the count to the register, handling assets at customer or third-party sites, and the link to CARO 3(i).
- Fixed assets & capexDepreciation testing: audit procedure and recomputationChecking useful lives against Schedule II, recomputing the charge independently for a sample, and handling mid-year additions, disposals and changes in estimate.
Free tools, no signup
Each one reads a file entirely in your browser — or, for two of them, just answers a few questions — and nothing is ever uploaded.
- Purchase register checkDuplicate payments, round-sum amounts, weekend-dated invoices, incomplete records.
- GSTR-2B reconcilerMatches your purchase register against GSTR-2B — missing invoices either side, amount mismatches.
- Bank reconciliation checkerMatches your cash book against a bank statement — what's outstanding on each side.
- Fixed asset register checkDuplicate asset codes, missing location or useful life, negative net book value.
- Payroll red-flag scannerBank accounts shared across employees, and records missing an ID, PAN or salary.
- CARO applicability checkerAnswer a few questions about the company and see which CARO 2020 clauses likely apply.
- MSME payment delay checkerMSME-flagged invoices paid — or still unpaid — beyond the 45-day Section 22 limit.
- Related-party transaction screenerTransactions above a threshold you set with no approval reference, grouped by counterparty.
- Materiality calculatorOverall and performance materiality against PBT, revenue, assets or equity, with reasoning shown.
- Sample size calculatorStatistical sample size for a test of controls or a substantive test of detail.