We use cookies to understand which pages and tools are useful, nothing more — no ad tracking across other sites. You can change this later from the footer.

Skip to content
Lekhya.in

Explainer3 min readPublished

Secretarial audit vs statutory audit: where they overlap

Where secretarial audit under section 204 and statutory audit overlap and where they diverge, including who relies on whose work and the specific compliance areas each actually tests.

Secretarial audit under section 204 of the Companies Act, performed by a company secretary in practice and reported in the prescribed Form MR-3, tests compliance with a defined set of laws applicable to the company, including the Companies Act, SEBI regulations for listed companies, and other specifically applicable laws, while a statutory audit under section 143 expresses an opinion on whether the financial statements give a true and fair view; the two overlap specifically on governance and procedural compliance matters disclosed in or affecting the financial statements, such as related-party approvals, board composition and CSR compliance, but a statutory auditor does not rely on a secretarial audit report as audit evidence for the financial statement opinion without independently assessing it, and the exact scope and applicability thresholds for secretarial audit should be confirmed against the current Act.

What secretarial audit covers that statutory audit does not

  • Compliance with the Depositories Act and related SEBI regulations for dematerialisation of shares.
  • Compliance with the SEBI takeover code, insider trading regulations and other listing regulations, for listed companies.
  • Adherence to secretarial standards issued by the Institute of Company Secretaries of India on board and general meetings.
  • Compliance with specifically applicable industry laws, which the practising company secretary identifies and lists specifically for that company's sector.

Where the two genuinely overlap

Overlap areas and what each audit actually tests
AreaSecretarial audit testsStatutory audit tests
Related-party transactionsProcedural compliance: board and shareholder approval process, disclosure in the registerFinancial statement impact: measurement, disclosure accuracy, arm's-length pricing where relevant
CSR complianceProcedural compliance: committee constitution, policy approval, action planFinancial impact: obligation computation accuracy, unspent amount transfer, CARO reporting
Board and committee compositionWhether composition meets statutory requirements at each point in the yearWhether this affects internal control reliance or disclosure in the financial statements
Loans, investments and guarantees under sections 185/186Procedural compliance: approvals obtained, filings madeFinancial statement impact: classification, disclosure, CARO clause 3(iv) reporting
Overlap areas and what each audit actually tests

Using secretarial audit findings in the statutory audit

  1. 01Obtain the secretarial audit report and read it alongside the board's responseQualifications or observations in Form MR-3, and the board's explanation for each, are relevant audit evidence on the control environment and compliance culture, read as a corroborating input rather than a substitute for the statutory auditor's own testing.
  2. 02Cross-check specific findings against financial statement assertionsA secretarial audit observation on a related-party approval not obtained in time has a direct bearing on whether that transaction's disclosure and the CARO related-party clause are correctly stated; follow each relevant finding through to the statutory audit's own conclusion.
  3. 03Do not extend reliance beyond the secretarial auditor's actual scopeSecretarial audit does not test the arithmetic accuracy of financial disclosures or the recoverability of related-party balances; a clean MR-3 report is not evidence on those financial statement assertions.

How we think about this

The two audits are complementary rather than overlapping in the sense of one replacing the other's work. Reading the secretarial audit report is cheap and often surfaces a governance issue worth following into the financial statements before it becomes a bigger finding later in the engagement.

Regulatory requirement

The exact applicability thresholds for secretarial audit under section 204, the prescribed Form MR-3, and the specific laws it covers for a given company are set out in the Companies Act and SEBI regulations as currently in force. Confirm all of these against current source material.

This is practical guidance written for audit teams, not an authoritative statement of any standard or statute. Standards, forms and timelines change. Check the current text issued by the ICAI and the relevant authority before relying on anything here in an audit file.

Free tools, no signup

Each one reads a file entirely in your browser — or, for two of them, just answers a few questions — and nothing is ever uploaded.