Testing bank overdraft classification means answering two separate questions with two separate rules: for the statement of cash flows under Ind AS 7, whether the overdraft is repayable on demand and forms an integral part of the entity's cash management, in which case it is included as a component of cash and cash equivalents; and for the balance sheet, whether the overdraft is a drawn borrowing facility, in which case it is presented as a current borrowing regardless of how it is treated in the cash flow statement. These two answers do not have to match, and auditors who assume they must often misclassify one or the other.
Why the same balance can be treated two different ways
Ind AS 7's cash equivalents test is about the role the overdraft plays in cash management — does the balance fluctuate between debit and credit as part of the entity's day-to-day pooling of funds, repayable on demand. Ind AS 1's balance sheet presentation is about what the overdraft actually is — a drawn facility from a bank, which is a borrowing. A facility can fail the cash-pooling test and still need to sit as a current borrowing on the balance sheet; it can pass the cash-pooling test and still need separate disclosure as a borrowing rather than being netted silently into a cash figure.
The testing sequence
- 01Obtain every overdraft and cash credit facility and its sanction letterConfirm the facility limit, whether it is repayable on demand, and whether it is linked to a cash-pooling or sweep arrangement across accounts.
- 02Trace the account's actual behaviour through the yearPull the bank statement or ledger for the full year and check whether the balance genuinely moves between debit and credit as receipts and payments flow through it, rather than sitting permanently drawn as a term-like facility that happens to be structured as an overdraft.
- 03Test whether the facility is repayable on demand in substance, not just in the sanction letter's boilerplateA facility renewed every year as a formality, with no history of the bank calling it, may still be legally repayable on demand — the legal right is what matters for the cash equivalents test, not the bank's practice.
- 04Conclude on the Ind AS 7 cash equivalents question account by accountOnly accounts that both swing between debit and credit as part of cash management and are legally repayable on demand qualify for inclusion in cash and cash equivalents; a permanently drawn cash credit account used as working capital finance does not.
- 05Separately test the balance sheet presentationA drawn overdraft or cash credit balance, whether or not it is netted into cash equivalents in the cash flow statement, is disclosed as a current borrowing on the balance sheet and in the borrowings note, with the facility and the drawn amount both stated.
- 06Confirm no inappropriate netting across different bank accounts or entitiesA debit balance in one account cannot be netted against a credit balance in an unrelated account unless there is a legal right of set-off and an intention to settle net; cross-account netting without that right is a presentation error, not a classification nuance.
- 07Agree the movement in overdraft balances treated as cash equivalents to the cash flow statement reconciliationThe opening and closing cash and cash equivalents note should include exactly the accounts concluded on above, and the reconciliation to the balance sheet should tie without a plug.
| Question | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Is the facility repayable on demand | Sanction letter terms, legal right of recall |
| Does it function as cash management | Bank statement showing debit-credit fluctuation across the year |
| Cash equivalent for the cash flow statement | Conclusion on both of the above, account by account |
| Current borrowing on the balance sheet | Drawn balance against sanctioned limit, regardless of the cash flow conclusion |
| Any netting applied | Legal right of set-off and intention to settle net, tested against the specific accounts netted |
A cash credit account that has been continuously drawn at or near its limit all year, with no debit-to-credit swing, is working capital borrowing dressed as an overdraft. Including it in cash and cash equivalents understates borrowings and overstates the liquidity the balance sheet appears to show.
How we think about this
Pulling the bank statement and checking whether the balance actually swings between debit and credit is a mechanical trace. Deciding whether that behaviour, and the facility's legal terms, together support treating it as a cash equivalent is a judgement about substance over form, and it is where this working paper earns its keep.
This is practical guidance written for audit teams, not an authoritative statement of any standard or statute. Standards, forms and timelines change. Check the current text issued by the ICAI and the relevant authority before relying on anything here in an audit file.
Related resources
- Bank, cash & treasuryBank reconciliation audit procedure for statutory auditWhat a BRS must reconcile, the red flags that separate a timing difference from a cover-up, and how many months you actually need to review.
- Audit documentationInd AS 7: the statement of cash flows, and classifying activities correctlyThe three-way split sounds obvious until a specific cash flow — interest paid, a short-term investment, a lease payment — doesn't obviously belong anywhere.
- Bank, cash & treasuryLoans and borrowings audit checklistSanction letter checks, charge verification against ROC filings, covenant compliance, interest testing, and current/non-current classification.
- Bank, cash & treasuryCash-on-hand verification: physical cash count procedureHow to run a surprise cash count with proper dual control, what to do with IOUs found in the box, and how much effort a small cash balance really deserves.
Free tools, no signup
Each one reads a file entirely in your browser — or, for two of them, just answers a few questions — and nothing is ever uploaded.
- Purchase register checkDuplicate payments, round-sum amounts, weekend-dated invoices, incomplete records.
- GSTR-2B reconcilerMatches your purchase register against GSTR-2B — missing invoices either side, amount mismatches.
- Bank reconciliation checkerMatches your cash book against a bank statement — what's outstanding on each side.
- Fixed asset register checkDuplicate asset codes, missing location or useful life, negative net book value.
- Payroll red-flag scannerBank accounts shared across employees, and records missing an ID, PAN or salary.
- CARO applicability checkerAnswer a few questions about the company and see which CARO 2020 clauses likely apply.
- MSME payment delay checkerMSME-flagged invoices paid — or still unpaid — beyond the 45-day Section 22 limit.
- Related-party transaction screenerTransactions above a threshold you set with no approval reference, grouped by counterparty.
- Depreciation useful life checkerCompares a useful life in use against the Schedule II, Part C indicative figure.
- Materiality calculatorOverall and performance materiality against PBT, revenue, assets or equity, with reasoning shown.
- Sample size calculatorStatistical sample size for a test of controls or a substantive test of detail.