We use cookies to understand which pages and tools are useful, nothing more — no ad tracking across other sites. You can change this later from the footer.

Skip to content
Lekhya.in

Reference3 min readPublished

Ind AS 108: operating segments, and why they're defined by management's own view, not the auditor's

How Ind AS 108 identifies reportable segments using the "management approach" — how the chief operating decision maker actually reviews the business, the quantitative thresholds, and the all-entity reconciliation requirement.

Ind AS 108 identifies operating segments using the "management approach": a segment is a component of the entity whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (CODM) — the person or group that allocates resources and assesses performance, not necessarily a specific job title — to make decisions about resources and assess performance, and for which discrete financial information is available. The standard deliberately defines segments by how the business is actually managed internally, rather than imposing an external classification scheme, which means the segments in the financial statements should match how management genuinely reviews the business, not a structure built just for the disclosure.

The quantitative thresholds for reportability

A segment is separately reportable if it meets any one of these
ThresholdTest
Revenue testIts reported revenue (external and intersegment combined) is 10% or more of total combined segment revenue
Profit or loss testIts reported profit or loss is 10% or more of the greater of the combined profit of all profitable segments, or the combined loss of all loss-making segments
Assets testIts assets are 10% or more of the combined assets of all operating segments
A segment is separately reportable if it meets any one of these

Regulatory requirement

If the total external revenue reported by operating segments constitutes less than 75% of the entity's total revenue, additional segments must be identified as reportable (even if they individually fail the 10% thresholds) until at least 75% of total revenue is included in reportable segments — a check worth performing explicitly, since it can require disclosing segments that would otherwise have been aggregated as "all other."

What audit review actually checks

  1. 01Confirm the segments disclosed actually match internal management reportingRequest the management reports actually reviewed by the CODM and compare them to the disclosed segment structure — a mismatch between the two is a direct indication the disclosure doesn't follow the management approach.
  2. 02Verify the 10% thresholds and the 75% revenue test were actually appliedNot assumed to be satisfied by the existing segment structure carried forward from last year without re-checking against current-year figures.
  3. 03Check the required reconciliation to entity totalsInd AS 108 requires reconciling total segment revenue, profit or loss, and assets to the corresponding entity totals in the financial statements — unallocated items and eliminations have to be disclosed separately, not simply absorbed silently into the reconciliation.

Common practice, not a requirement

A company reorganising its internal management reporting structure mid-year — a genuine change in how the CODM reviews the business — should reflect that change in its segment disclosure, with prior-period segment comparatives restated to the new structure, unless the information needed to restate isn't available without undue cost or effort.

This is practical guidance written for audit teams, not an authoritative statement of any standard or statute. Standards, forms and timelines change. Check the current text issued by the ICAI and the relevant authority before relying on anything here in an audit file.

Free tools, no signup

Each one reads a file entirely in your browser — or, for two of them, just answers a few questions — and nothing is ever uploaded.