We use cookies to understand which pages and tools are useful, nothing more — no ad tracking across other sites. You can change this later from the footer.

Skip to content
Lekhya.in

Reference3 min readPublished

Ind AS 40: investment property, and why it's classified by purpose, not by type

What makes a property "investment property" under Ind AS 40 rather than ordinary property, plant and equipment, the cost model that applies in India, and the reclassification triggers that move a property between the two categories.

Ind AS 40 defines investment property as land or a building held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation, or both — rather than for use in the entity's own operations, or for sale in the ordinary course of business. The classification test is entirely about purpose, not the physical nature of the asset: an identical office building is investment property if the company rents it out to unrelated tenants, but ordinary property, plant and equipment under Ind AS 16 if the company occupies it for its own operations. Under the Indian carve-out from the full IFRS standard, investment property is measured using the cost model, not the fair value model IFRS otherwise permits — depreciated the same way an owner-occupied building would be, with fair value only disclosed in the notes, not used for measurement on the balance sheet.

Classification cases that need judgment

Working through the purpose test
SituationClassification
A building rented entirely to unrelated third-party tenants under operating leasesInvestment property — held to earn rentals
A building the company occupies for its own head officeProperty, plant and equipment — held for use in operations, under Ind AS 16
A building partly owner-occupied, partly rented to third partiesSplit between the two categories if the portions can be separately sold or leased; classified as PPE in full if the owner-occupied portion is insignificant
A building leased to a subsidiary within the same groupInvestment property in the subsidiary's own standalone financial statements (a genuine third party to it), but treated as owner-occupied in the CONSOLIDATED financial statements, since the group as a whole occupies it
Property held for sale in the ordinary course of business (a real estate developer's inventory)Inventory, not investment property — Ind AS 40 specifically excludes property held for sale in the ordinary course
Working through the purpose test

The group-vs-standalone classification difference for intra-group leased property is a common source of inconsistency — a property correctly classified as investment property in a subsidiary's standalone accounts has to be reclassified to PPE on consolidation, and a consolidation working paper that doesn't make this adjustment carries the misclassification into the group financial statements.

What triggers a reclassification

A change in use — the company starts occupying a previously rented building for its own operations, or stops renting a building and begins developing it for sale — triggers reclassification between investment property, PPE, and inventory as appropriate. The reclassification happens at the point the change in use is evidenced by an actual change in use, not merely by a management decision or intention that hasn't yet been acted on.

This is practical guidance written for audit teams, not an authoritative statement of any standard or statute. Standards, forms and timelines change. Check the current text issued by the ICAI and the relevant authority before relying on anything here in an audit file.

Free tools, no signup

Each one reads a file entirely in your browser — or, for two of them, just answers a few questions — and nothing is ever uploaded.