We use cookies to understand which pages and tools are useful, nothing more — no ad tracking across other sites. You can change this later from the footer.

Skip to content
Lekhya.in

Reference3 min readPublished

SA 560: subsequent events, and the three periods the standard treats differently

How SA 560 splits an auditor's responsibility for subsequent events into three distinct periods — up to the report date, between the report date and issuance, and after issuance — with a different obligation in each.

SA 560 splits the auditor's responsibility for events occurring after the balance sheet date into three distinct periods, each carrying a different obligation. Up to the date of the auditor's report, the auditor has an active duty to perform procedures designed to identify subsequent events requiring adjustment or disclosure. Between the report date and the date the financial statements are issued, the auditor has no active duty to perform further procedures, but if a fact becomes known that would have affected the report had it been known earlier, action is required. After issuance, the auditor generally has no obligation to make any inquiry regarding the financial statements at all, though specific action is still required if a fact becomes known that existed at the report date and might have changed it.

The two kinds of subsequent event

Adjusting vs. non-adjusting events
TypeWhat it meansExample
Adjusting eventProvides evidence of a condition that existed AT the balance sheet dateA customer's bankruptcy filed after year end, confirming a receivable was already uncollectible at the balance sheet date
Non-adjusting eventIndicative of a condition that arose AFTER the balance sheet dateA fire destroying a warehouse after year end — the loss relates to a new event, not a condition existing at the balance sheet date, though disclosure may still be required
Adjusting vs. non-adjusting events

What active procedures up to the report date actually involve

  1. 01Review management's own procedures for identifying subsequent eventsDoes the entity itself have a process for this, and did it operate?
  2. 02Read minutes of meetings held after the balance sheet dateBoard and committee minutes covering the period up to the report date, inquiring about matters discussed where minutes aren't yet available.
  3. 03Read the entity's latest available interim financial informationWhere it exists, for signals of a condition relevant to the period under audit.
  4. 04Make specific inquiries of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governanceAbout new commitments, borrowings, guarantees, asset sales, litigation developments, and any other matters affecting the financial statements.

What happens if a fact surfaces after the report date

If a fact becomes known after the report is issued that would have caused the auditor to amend the report had it been known at the time, SA 560 requires discussing the matter with management and, where the financial statements need amendment, performing procedures on the amendment and issuing a new or amended report — a notably more involved process than discovering the same fact before the original report date, and not something the standard allows to simply be set aside as "too late to matter."

How we think about this

The three-period structure exists because an auditor's practical ability to find out about something changes sharply after the report is signed and issued — the standard calibrates the obligation to that reality rather than pretending the duty to investigate continues at full strength indefinitely.

This is practical guidance written for audit teams, not an authoritative statement of any standard or statute. Standards, forms and timelines change. Check the current text issued by the ICAI and the relevant authority before relying on anything here in an audit file.

Free tools, no signup

Each one reads a file entirely in your browser — or, for two of them, just answers a few questions — and nothing is ever uploaded.