We use cookies to understand which pages and tools are useful, nothing more — no ad tracking across other sites. You can change this later from the footer.

Skip to content
Lekhya.in

Reference3 min readPublished

Ind AS 10: events after the reporting period, and the adjusting/non-adjusting line

What Ind AS 10 actually requires for an event occurring between the balance sheet date and approval of the financial statements — the adjusting/non-adjusting distinction, and the specific dividend and going-concern rules.

Ind AS 10 requires an entity to distinguish between two kinds of event occurring after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are approved for issue: adjusting events, which provide evidence of conditions that existed AT the balance sheet date and therefore require the financial statements themselves to be adjusted, and non-adjusting events, which are indicative of conditions arising AFTER the balance sheet date and are disclosed in the notes rather than adjusted into the figures. The classification question is always "did the condition exist at the balance sheet date," never "did the event happen before the report was signed" — a subtle but consequential distinction.

Worked examples of each

Adjusting vs. non-adjusting, with the reasoning
EventClassificationWhy
A customer's bankruptcy, filed after year end, for a receivable outstanding at year endAdjustingConfirms the receivable was already impaired — the customer's deteriorating financial condition existed at the balance sheet date
Discovery of fraud or error that shows the financial statements were incorrectAdjustingThe error existed at the balance sheet date; its discovery afterward doesn't change when the condition arose
A decline in market value of investments after year endNon-adjustingReflects circumstances arising after the balance sheet date, not a condition existing at it
A major business combination or disposal after year endNon-adjustingA new event, not evidence of something that already existed
A natural disaster destroying a major asset after year endNon-adjustingThe destruction is a new event; the asset existed and was presumably functioning at the balance sheet date itself
Adjusting vs. non-adjusting, with the reasoning

Two specific rules the standard calls out directly

  1. 01Dividends declared after the reporting periodNot recognised as a liability at the balance sheet date, even if declared before the financial statements are approved — because the obligation didn't exist at the reporting date. Disclosed in the notes, not recognised on the balance sheet.
  2. 02Going concern basis affected by a post-year-end eventIf management determines after the reporting date that it intends to liquidate the entity, or has no realistic alternative, Ind AS 10 requires NOT preparing the financial statements on a going-concern basis at all — a fundamentally different outcome from simply disclosing a non-adjusting event, and the most serious application of the standard.

Regulatory requirement

A material non-adjusting event's disclosure must include the nature of the event and an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made — a one-line mention with no financial context does not satisfy the standard's disclosure requirement.

This is practical guidance written for audit teams, not an authoritative statement of any standard or statute. Standards, forms and timelines change. Check the current text issued by the ICAI and the relevant authority before relying on anything here in an audit file.

Free tools, no signup

Each one reads a file entirely in your browser — or, for two of them, just answers a few questions — and nothing is ever uploaded.