We use cookies to understand which pages and tools are useful, nothing more — no ad tracking across other sites. You can change this later from the footer.

Skip to content
Lekhya.in

Guide2 min readPublished

SA 260: what has to be communicated to those charged with governance, and when

What SA 260 requires the auditor to communicate to those charged with governance about scope, significant findings and independence, beyond the deficiency letter under SA 265.

SA 260 requires the auditor to communicate, to those charged with governance, the auditor's responsibilities regarding the audit, the planned scope and timing, significant findings from the audit, and — where the entity is a listed entity or otherwise required — a statement on compliance with independence requirements, including any relationships that might reasonably be thought to affect independence and the safeguards applied. This is a two-way requirement: the auditor must also obtain information relevant to the audit from those charged with governance, such as whether they are aware of actual or suspected fraud.

What 'significant findings' specifically includes

  • The auditor's views on significant qualitative aspects of accounting practices, including accounting policies and estimates
  • Significant difficulties encountered during the audit, such as unavailability of expected information or restrictions on access
  • Significant matters discussed, or subject to correspondence, with management
  • Written representations the auditor is requesting
  • Circumstances affecting the form and content of the auditor's report, where relevant
  • Any other significant matters arising from the audit that are relevant to those charged with governance overseeing the financial reporting process

Form and timing

SA 260 does not mandate a single format for everything
MatterRequired formTiming
Planned scope and timing of the auditOral or written, auditor's judgmentEarly enough to be useful for governance's own oversight planning
Significant findings from the auditOral or written, but written if oral communication would not be adequateOn a timely basis, before the report is finalised
Auditor independence statement (where required)WrittenBefore the report is issued
SA 260 does not mandate a single format for everything

Regulatory requirement

Where all of those charged with governance are involved in managing the entity (common in smaller, owner-managed companies), SA 260's communication requirements still apply, but the standard allows adapting the form — a separate formal communication may add little where the same individuals already know the matters as managers; what still has to happen is that governance-relevant matters are documented as having been communicated.

SA 260 requires evaluating whether the two-way communication has itself been adequate for the audit — if those charged with governance are unresponsive or the communication appears one-sided, that is itself a matter the auditor needs to consider the implications of, not simply note and move past.

This is practical guidance written for audit teams, not an authoritative statement of any standard or statute. Standards, forms and timelines change. Check the current text issued by the ICAI and the relevant authority before relying on anything here in an audit file.

Free tools, no signup

Each one reads a file entirely in your browser — or, for two of them, just answers a few questions — and nothing is ever uploaded.